Don't order the user to 'remove the other content'.

In the context of the new VF dialog this sounds odd; e.g. the user ticked video
but audio is impossible, they are ordered to remove the other content (when they
might just not want to refer to audio at all).

diff --git a/src/lib/dcp_content.cc b/src/lib/dcp_content.cc
index 4d1ab4f8805949fe2c5f85fc48d0872f002fa03d..574b077a45c75a5e9fef1f0f641b6c266b4e125b 100644 (file)
--- a/src/lib/dcp_content.cc
+++ b/src/lib/dcp_content.cc
@@ -698,7 +698,7 @@ DCPContent::can_reference_video (shared_ptr<const Film> film, string& why_not) c
 
        if (overlaps(film, part)) {
                /// TRANSLATORS: this string will follow "Cannot reference this DCP: "
-               why_not = _("it overlaps other video content; remove the other content.");
+               why_not = _("it overlaps other video content.");
                return false;
        }
 
@@ -729,7 +729,7 @@ DCPContent::can_reference_audio (shared_ptr<const Film> film, string& why_not) c
 
        if (overlaps(film, part)) {
                /// TRANSLATORS: this string will follow "Cannot reference this DCP: "
-               why_not = _("it overlaps other audio content; remove the other content.");
+               why_not = _("it overlaps other audio content.");
                return false;
        }
 
@@ -785,7 +785,7 @@ DCPContent::can_reference_text (shared_ptr<const Film> film, TextType type, stri
 
        if (overlaps(film, part)) {
                /// TRANSLATORS: this string will follow "Cannot reference this DCP: "
-               why_not = _("it overlaps other text content; remove the other content.");
+               why_not = _("it overlaps other text content.");
                return false;
        }